My straight talk hot spot is 60x faster than the .25 mbps I’m getting right now

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 3 weeks ago
  • Acknowledged
Photo of Michael Morgan

Michael Morgan

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
  • ticked

Posted 4 weeks ago

  • 1
Photo of J&J

J&J

  • 22 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
I call fraud on the part of Michael Morgan

I'm not in the habit of defending ViaSat but this one can't go un-challenged.

You tested an AT&T connection, with only one bar of signal.
You tested with a nearly dead battery
You tested at 9:54PM, a high-congestion period for the Internet.

You made no reference to ViaSat in any way, anywhere, in your post.  Are you absolutely certain you are complaining at the right forum?

Photo of Michael Morgan

Michael Morgan

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yes this is Viastat service I’m talking about. It’s terrible I can’t even get bass pros wedsite to fully load. I guarantee I can run the test of my laptop and I get the same terrible results. Just look on Facebook reviews. There’s plenty of people saying they get less than 1mbps speeds
Photo of J&J

J&J

  • 22 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
Latency 40 ms ? They did test using speedtest.net, not google....
Photo of Michael Morgan

Michael Morgan

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Took me 45 min to upload 6 pics to eBay last week
Photo of Michael Morgan

Michael Morgan

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Even worse on the laptop
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 2334 Posts
  • 1424 Reply Likes
Latency 40 ms ? They did test using speedtest.net, not google....
Actually, the opposite.  
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 2337 Posts
  • 1425 Reply Likes
This isn't a direct support site.  They aren't going to reach out to you.  If you need help, you can email them at viasatlistens@viasat.com or call Customer Care at 855-463-9333.  If you email them be sure to include your account number so they know who you are.  

You shouldn't post your phone number in public.  
Photo of Michael Morgan

Michael Morgan

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Yes this is Viastat service I’m talking about. It’s terrible I can’t even get bass pros wedsite to fully load. I guarantee I can run the test of my laptop and I get the same terrible results. Just look on Facebook reviews. There’s plenty of people saying they get less than 1mbps speeds
Photo of Homeskillet

Homeskillet

  • 470 Posts
  • 182 Reply Likes
It shows latency of 40ms, which is impossible with satellite internet, something does not smell right here. A proper test of satellite internet should show latency around 600ms, give or take 100ms or so.
Photo of Old Labs

Old Labs

  • 399 Posts
  • 356 Reply Likes
It's the speed test offered by Google when doing a search and is offered by Measurement Lab. It's been repeatedly shown to be inaccurate for satellite internet in terms of the latency although the speed portion is typically in agreement with other speed test sites. Measurement Lab (M-LAB) acknowledges the latency is inaccurate when used on satellite connections due to the methodology they use.

To pass the speed test purity test around here, simply use either speedtest.net or testmy.net -  folks here don't trust this one regardless of whether it yields good or bad speed results (although for me it's been consistent with the other major players in terms of speed so I believe your speed portion).

There is a better way to measure latency over at  testmy.net -  the TCP latency test for the reasons mentioned there:

https://testmy.net/latency

Then of course there's always the age old question to be answered -  what plan are you on an how much of your priority data have you used? We already know you were nesting it during peak prime time hours on the day after Christmas. That TCP latency test will likely divulge what the real issue is - dropped packets as a result of network congestion, and even more of them if you've exceeded your priority data which yields an unusable connection.

The DSL Reports speed test measures dropped/retransmitted packets. Similarly speedtest.net will measure that key stat if you can locate one of their servers that measures that.
(Edited)
Photo of Tim Spake

Tim Spake

  • 487 Posts
  • 268 Reply Likes
That usbe my typical speed every night. Thank god I have moved on from ViaSat
Photo of Homeskillet

Homeskillet

  • 470 Posts
  • 182 Reply Likes
On the other hand if someone can get 15 Mbps on a straight talk hot spot, why have Viasat? If you can't get hardwired high speed internet you have to grab what works best in your location. Location is everything when it comes to internet broadcast over the airwaves, no matter what TV ads or a salesman tell you.
Photo of Old Labs

Old Labs

  • 399 Posts
  • 356 Reply Likes
Because one can supplement the other in my case, although a different MVNO. In my case, Viasat outperforms wireless in the evenings and prime time. The free zone allows me to better manage limited data in both cases.

For many there is no one size fits all solution.
(Edited)
Photo of Homeskillet

Homeskillet

  • 470 Posts
  • 182 Reply Likes
Seems to me it would be more cost effective to just add satellite TV to whatever non hardwired service works best instead of paying for satellite and cell wireless internet combined. Also I have never heard of anyone complain about weather issues with cell internet service.
Photo of Old Labs

Old Labs

  • 399 Posts
  • 356 Reply Likes
I've got satellite TV also. I rarely stream. Wireless and satellite internet cover my internet needs. Both are limited despite marketing hype. Everybody's needs differ. In my case I want to balance my mobile internet needs (2 lines) and laptop needs at the lowest total cost. TV doesn't factor into that because neither would support the data demands of that.

You've never heard me complain of weather issues - mine survives everything except ice and hurricane like conditions and I can live with those. Neither service is perfect and the wireless required investing in a $500 signal booster.

Now that I've determined which network provides the better coverage, I'll probably invest in a better signal booster that specifically targets that network allowing even better gain. But this will suffice for now as 5G rolls out as Playon and the free zone meet my "streaming" needs.
(Edited)
Photo of Homeskillet

Homeskillet

  • 470 Posts
  • 182 Reply Likes
While you haven't complained of weather issues with satellite, many have. I haven't heard anyone complain about weather related issues with cell wireless, I am not saying it can't happen.
Photo of Old Labs

Old Labs

  • 399 Posts
  • 356 Reply Likes
It is if you live on the median in his area :)
(Edited)
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 2334 Posts
  • 1425 Reply Likes
Time to break out the pup tent!  LOL.  
Photo of Old Labs

Old Labs

  • 399 Posts
  • 356 Reply Likes
Venture off the interstate if you like dueling banjos. Nah just kidding.
(Edited)
Photo of Homeskillet

Homeskillet

  • 470 Posts
  • 182 Reply Likes
I-95 is well connected, but don't venture too far off it or you will be lucky to match 3rd world country services.
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 325 Posts
  • 206 Reply Likes
I lived near I95 in CT, VA and FL and have traveled it many times in my life.  As an OTR truck driver Ive traveled 47 of the lower 48 and found I95 is one of the best covered routes in the country.

I also know the northern plains, Montana, the Dakotas etc .... the last thing you want to hear in the middle of NOWHERE is,  "You have reached Daves Mountain Communications LLC, Your carrier does not have an agreement to use this tower, If you wish to continue please press 1 and enter a credit card number to complete this call"