Viasat & Exede have me blocked on Facebook! I can't ask questions or complain anymore. Is anyone else blocked?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 2 years ago
  • Answered
I am not getting the service I pay for so I used to write and complain about it. Now they have me blocked on Facebook. I can no longer send a message when I have a problem or comment on their page. Is anyone else blocked? It sure would be nice to have an internet company that cared and did their best to work with their customers. I have been with Exede for about 4 years now waiting for better service. That is a long time to be kept waiting. I don't know what to do. My choices are Exede or Hughes Net. I did a speed test at speedtest.net...several actually at different times tonight and my highest DL was 7.75 and UPLoad 0.94. I have put up with this for several years now.....waiting for better service. I don't think it is ever going to happen with this company. I kinda want to upgrade but feel that I would still have too many problems. Has anyone upgraded to the unlimited plan that had problems before? I have the 10mbs plan right now and free time from 12-?6AM and pay $60 and change a month. 
Photo of Patty Vaughan

Patty Vaughan

  • 25 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Patty Vaughan

Patty Vaughan

  • 25 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
PS: Even my free time is terrible 90% of the time. After midnight I need to watch work videos and other videos that I can't watch during the day and they don't play without stop and starting every few seconds. Maybe they (Exede/Viasat) are just trying to get rid of their old customers. idk :( 
Photo of Patty Vaughan

Patty Vaughan

  • 25 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Also: I have been blocked for quite a while now. I can only call but most of my problems are late at night and really during the day. I have to unplug my modem or shut down and restart my PC every time I leave my computer for more than 1/2 an hour. It's is crazy :). 
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2815 Posts
  • 1468 Reply Likes
You consider 7 mbps to be terrible? If the service is so horrible, you should have ditched Exede/Viasat after your contract was up two years ago.


I don't blame them for blocking you.
(Edited)
Photo of Virgil Teffeteller

Virgil Teffeteller

  • 35 Posts
  • 13 Reply Likes
That is awful easy to say when you have more options to choice from.He is probable in same boat I am in no other options to choice from.Oh you don't have to worry just as soon as soon as  something better comes alone I promise to leave you with my band width.Nothing more need to be said.
Photo of James trent

James trent

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
I got unlimited 12 silver package...mine is on and off so far all day every day..so pissed
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Have you tried: Viasat Internet mobile app

How do your signal stats look: Click Here

Are you using a router?

Is PC hooked direct to SB2 modem via Ethernet cable?
Photo of David Ramos

David Ramos

  • 21 Posts
  • 14 Reply Likes
Thanks for the signal checker, I needed this. I have the unlimit 12 plan, I have had only 1 problem. Customer support was fantastic! Im running between 12 and 15 mbps. I should have cancelled verizon long ago. Sorry to hear everyone having problems. I cant complain
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2813 Posts
  • 1466 Reply Likes
Nothing is wrong with her service. She has been complaining on Facebook so she could get extra data and credits to lower her bill. Viasat got tired of it and blocked her on Facebook so now she is here to complain.
Photo of Brandon Fisher

Brandon Fisher

  • 92 Posts
  • 16 Reply Likes
Wait they give out data and credits if you complain enough holy crap i need to get on that band wagon then. I would love free data with my already, wait..... Unlimited unthrottled data.......
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2815 Posts
  • 1468 Reply Likes
She is complaining about 7 mbps down and 1 mbps up. Let that sink in before you start offering to help her.


Some DSL connections barely do 3 mbps down and 256k up.
(Edited)
Photo of david

david, Champion

  • 562 Posts
  • 399 Reply Likes
Yea, I saw that. I was wondering what you could do at 12Mbps that you can't at 7.75Mbps with the 10 gig plan.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Blocking might be an IP issue, or user configuration issue.

Video buffering can be resolved via Download Manager.

Modem/PC issue might be on her side.  If using router with QOS engaged, this can cause slow speeds (aka buffering).

"Too many" rambling thoughts...
Photo of Mark here

Mark here

  • 88 Posts
  • 27 Reply Likes
I'd be very happy with that
Photo of Deku (The #1 Hero Data Saver)

Deku (The #1 Hero Data Saver), Champion

  • 931 Posts
  • 505 Reply Likes
just so ya know :3 i have a program called IDM (a.k.a internet download management) and so far... ive bought the 1 year license thing and the 1 year was almost up... so ive bought the entire life time license :3 so whenever i go onto youtube the little thing pops up at the right hand corner of every video and says download video and it either gives me a choice of what format i want to download... (i always tend to download the 480p ones :3 ) BUT!!! youll have to install it to the google chrome or the sparrow browser or whatever web surfing ya do :3

BUT!!! the life time license is ONLY onto 1 computer... BUT!!! i know how to bypass that and get it onto MULTIPLY computers :3 BUT!!! here is the link if ya want to buy it :3 also... every website i go to always has that download video little thing at the right hand corner and you just click it and you can rename it as what you want... and itll download once downloaded you can go into your downloads folder and look for the folder video and click onto the folder video and play it :3 BUT!!! i use VLC which you can download also which is for free :3 to play your work videos (i tend to play all video formats onto VLC :3 cause its awesomeness!!! i even play my youtube videos, anime videos, how to videos, ect. ect. :3  )

HERE IS THE LINK TO THE IDM!!! (a.k.a internet download management :3 your gonna HAVE to buy the life time license just once AND ITS YOUR FOREVER!!! MAKE SURE DO NOT LOOSE THE LICENSE KEY NOR ANY OF THE INFORMATION THEY SEND YA VIA EMAIL!!! CAUSE THOSE ARE YOUR ONLY ACCESS FOR WHEN THEY SEND YA THE KEY FOR YOU TO PUT INTO THE KEY THING ONTO THE IDM!!!  )

https://www.internetdownloadmanager.com/

VLC VIDEO PLAYER!!! :3 (this is free :3  )

https://www.videolan.org/vlc/

HOPE IVE HELPED YA OUT ONTO THE VIDEO THING!!! :3

the other thing... i dont know how to help ya out... but you could email viasat though :3 (i forgots what there email address was to be honest DX  sorry ;-;   )
Photo of Brandon Fisher

Brandon Fisher

  • 92 Posts
  • 16 Reply Likes
I personally use Eagle get and the MEGAsync download agent i pay for Mega cloud service and eagle get does everything IDM does but its free.
Photo of Dave Eicher

Dave Eicher

  • 155 Posts
  • 27 Reply Likes
Free zone time with 10 gig plan, 15.46 Download, 1.00 upload
Photo of Jim16

Jim16

  • 2453 Posts
  • 2183 Reply Likes
Not being able to stream at 7mbs is an issue on her end.  That's HD territory.  But she has probably left this forum and won't be helped. Only came to complain because she can't on Facebook anymore.  They have every right to ban people who contribute nothing to the conversation. ( uh, maybe I shouldn't have said that...)
Photo of Gary

Gary

  • 26 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
If I could get 7Mbps down I would be so happy ... so very happy! ... from what I can tell, whatever the advertised speed you are paying for you should expect to get about 25-30% of that ...

Example: You have the Bronze 12 (up to 12Mbps down) ... you should expect around 3Mbps down
or if you have the 25Mbps down plan, then you should expect about 6-7Mbps down.

I have read hundreds of complaints on this website and if you throw out the ones saying that they are getting less than 1Mbps and the ones who are getting their full advertised speeds then 25-30% of advertised speed seems to be the standard.
Photo of Jim16

Jim16

  • 2453 Posts
  • 2183 Reply Likes
Hundreds of complaints on a complaint forum out of 600,000 customers mean 30% of advertised speed.  You are obviously not a statistician!  Not the best sampling, is it.  If I go to a forum for twins and all the posts are from twins, then the entire country is made up of twins.  Sounds logical.
(Edited)
Photo of Gary

Gary

  • 26 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Be careful, your ignorance is on full display. 

I said, I had read hundreds of complains on this website in a thread re: download speeds ... I should not have to clarify that my response is re: the topic of the thread.

Not all of the complaints are about speed. Not all of the threads are complaints.
Example, your complaint on this "complaint" forum has nothing to do with download speed, therefore, it gets thrown out.

Maybe I should have posted in way that a 8th grader can understand ... 
  • I have read multiple hundreds of complaints on this website.
  • I have thrown out the complaints that did not relate to speed issues.
  • I have also thrown out the complaints that were on the top or bottom ... "top" = people who were getting their advertised speeds and "bottom" = people who were getting less than 1Mbps.
Of the "hundreds" that were left from my sample, I have concluded that 25-30% of advertised speed appears to be the norm.

You are correct, I am not a statistician by trade, but I am one by hobby and most polls and statistics are done by sampling small amounts of data and then extrapolating that data to larger bits of data. This method is used in law enforcement, banking, trading, politics, etc ...
(Edited)
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
Technically speaking the sample you derived from here is invalid - it is skewed/biased toward those who are having issues/problems - that may or may not be a valid representation of the overall subscriber population since people having no/few problems tend not to even show up here - very few come here to praise their speeds, but those having speed issues certainly do.
   
Photo of Gary

Gary

  • 26 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
It is the only data that I have at my disposal ... so you want a clarifier then, well here it is ... Of the people complaining about download speeds on a complaint board I have, IMO, reached a conclusion that about 25-30% of advertised speeds seem to be the norm ... 
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
That's better and you've now made it clear that your not extrapolating it to the larger set of data of all subscribers in general.

So what have you done to determine the cause for your slow speeds? When does it occur? Which specific plan are you on? The list of questions goes on... there may be some steps to improve your lot or it may simply be that you're on an overloaded spot beam for now. Many of us are and have learned to work around it - none of us like it but arguing stats obtained from a flawed sample isn't going to solve anything.

You apparently feel you should be guaranteed a minimum performance level -  state a number that's considered acceptable for all users. Then divide 140,000 Mbps (or 140 Gbps) by that number - that would roughly yield the maximum number of subcribers that could be supported on Viasat-1 to ensure your minimum. There's a little more to it - but should give you a relative order of magnitude of the maximum number of subscribers.
(Edited)
Photo of Gary

Gary

  • 26 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Wow ... you really are an ass.

I never asked for anything. I was merely responding to the OP who was complaining about getting 7Mbps and I said that I would be very happy with that.

I then offered some anecdotal data that I had learned from reading these forums that simply stated that actual speeds seem to be running at about 25-30% of advertised speeds. 

Then, for whatever reason you felt the need to pipe up with the ramblings of a mad man.

But since you brought it up, I do feel that "up to" needs to be more clearly defined. While 0.02Mbps is technically "up to 12Mbps" the sales team "assured" me over and over that I would see speeds no lower than 2-3Mbps when in fact, my speed rarely see those number ... at this point I think I'd be very happy with 2-3Mbps.

You asked, what have I done about it ...
  • unplugged and replugged
  • called and called again
  • 3 technician visits
Other than that, there is not much for me to do.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2814 Posts
  • 1466 Reply Likes
You could try moving to Louisiana. The beam that covers the Baton Rouge area is awesome.
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
Yes "up to" does indeed need to be clarified for new subscribers before they signup, as do the terms "unlimited data", data usage threshold and (de)prioritization.

Similarly the terms "Video Streaming at Small Screen Quality Typically 360p", "Video Streaming at DVD QualityTypically 480p" and "Video Streaming at HD Quality Typically 720p" deserve some further clarification also.

Beyond Stephen's recommendation (I may actually try that one provided he buys the first King Cake) there are some other things that could be checked (things that even phone suppoprt or many installers might not be aware of - the former's expertise typically rests with reading scripts while the latter's expertise generally rests with the modem and physical install althought there are some exceptions) - but good luck with those since you shouldn't be happy to rarely see 2-3 Mbps as best. I certainly wouldn't be (with the emphasis there on rarely). However, if you qualify that with rarely do I see better than 2-3 Mbps during prime time... welcome to the club but again some actions can be taken to make it a more usable experience during prime time.      

There is more for you to do including verifying what the technicians told you - but you'll need to seek that advice elsewhere than from an ass and a madman ;) 
(Edited)
Photo of Jim16

Jim16

  • 2453 Posts
  • 2183 Reply Likes
"but you'll need to seek that advice elsewhere than from an ass and a madman ;) "

That's too bad Gary.  That ass and mad man :) can be of great help to you if you want.  But all you want is to make up fake stats that show you have no clue.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2814 Posts
  • 1466 Reply Likes
Louisiana is a decent state. We have good food, nice people, and decent gun laws. It's still a relatively free country/state where I live. The only bad thing is our crooked politicians.
Photo of Jim16

Jim16

  • 2453 Posts
  • 2183 Reply Likes
I wish someone would block me on Facebook.  
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2815 Posts
  • 1468 Reply Likes
I suppose I could send an email to viasatlistens@viasat.com to complain and get some sort of freebie, but honestly, I'm perfectly happy with what I have.

Unfortunately, the good people at Viasat corporate know I'm a happy customer since I brag on this forum all the time.

It would be an interesting experiment to email them, but we all know what would happen.  They would just send me a pack of bubble gum and recommend a movie such as "They Live".
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
She's not speaking...more like Dawn's rant
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 320 Posts
  • 204 Reply Likes
I too have been with Exede 5 years or so.  I am on the same plan you are with the same issue.  From what I have been told STAY ON THE PLAN YOU HAVE until Viasat 2 is in full operation.  Cherish your 12 to 5 free zone.  My speeds drop drastically when school lets out.  In foul weather when everyone is indoors its ridiculous.  If I am restricted, my internet is not over 1 Mbps outside my free zone and is totally USELESS.

It frustrates me as well that I am paying for "high speed internet" and it works well, as long as everybody else isnt online at the time.  And it burns me that we on congested beams pay the same as customers on beams without issues, with a fraction of the service and/or quality.  It has given me a very poor opinion of Viasat/Exede that in years of dealing with this their only response has been "Viasat 2 is coming" Ive gotten no compensation, no explanation, and not even an apology,   Just keep paying your bill.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Yeah they tend to block for anything other than positive criticism. If you upgrade to the lowest unlimited plan you should expect that speed in about prime time hours.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Ronald:

It's tough on cable too:-)

Prime time Blast! tier download speed SLOW

1. I do get about 240Mbps before prime time (before about 7PM or so)

2. However, during prime time (about 7PM to 11PM) I see very much lower speeds. Sometimes less than 100Mbps and very often less than 150Mbps, never goes up to 200Mbps.

Ronald, see how they complain...poor thing...100 Mbps must be a real PIA.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2814 Posts
  • 1466 Reply Likes
Is there even a notice difference is speed between 5 mbps and 200 mbps when browsing the net or streaming movies?

I'd think the only difference would be when downloading large games.

Instead of it taking 2 minutes to download a 50 gb game it might take 4 minutes. Wow.
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
If you upgrade to the lowest unlimited plan you should expect that speed in about prime time hours.
The general consensus around here is that the same would be true even on a 25 or 30 Mbps plan on Viasat-1 right now. You aren't paying for prioritized "speeds" at those levels you're paying for the potential/capability for higher "speeds" at those levels subject to current network conditions. Specifically if capacity is over utilized at a given point in time everybody suffers - the real difference between "unlimited data" plans going forward will be the data usage thresholds before (de)prioritization and levels of throttling for detected video streams.      
(Edited)
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: "paying for the potential/capability for higher "speeds"

On one slower cable system, 10 Mbps is their basic plan, but to stream say Netflix, a higher plan is required, otherwise buffering.

I suspect with tiered plans, it appears here that download speeds are proportional to your plan when congestion kicks in.
(Edited)
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
I suspect with tiered plans, it appears here that download speeds are proportional to your plan when congestion kicks in.

There's noting in writing that expressly states that and the question has been asked on numerous occasions with no real clarification provided by Viasat.
(Edited)
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 320 Posts
  • 204 Reply Likes
I could care less if my "speed" is 5 or 200.  As it has been stated many times, you can do most anything at "up to 12 Mbps"  I am paying for "internet access" not "speed" my "problem" is the amount of time my beam is so congested that at times my internet is painfully slow, or not accessible at all.  I could care less if my speed is 3 Mbps.  I am sick of pages timing out or freezing IF my request transmits at all.

My problem with the "unlimited" plans is when the 150 "priority data" is used you get restricted "during heavy usage", what they dont tell you is on my heavily congested beam that is almost 24/7, and is usually below 1 Mbps.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: "in writing that expressly states"

Did you read David's blog, he's a DOCSIS geek:-)

So, the config file is sent to the modem, which includes download/upload specs.

Somehow, Cisco's QOS equipment is aware of users' speeds, and then applies Congestion Management when the time comes. But, each ISP can twitch the settings, as they see fit, if they can figure it out.

Needless to say, data types (VOIP, FTP, Video, etc) get prioritized, from "me first," to "you last."

Based upon that local cable provider, premium customers get better service, during congestion.  But, you could ask David at bottom of comment section, or direct via email. Ultimately, congestion is a shared experience, or rank ($$$) has its privileges.  Economically, an ISP's ARPU might increase with rank being a higher priority.

Tidbit I came across

DOCSIS 1.0 - QoS profile 5 corresponds to a service providing 256 Kbps in the downstream and 64 Kbps is the upstream.

I remember those "fast days," on a WISP provider.
(Edited)
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
Unless David works or writes for Viasat he can't answer my question. It's a question regarding Viuasat's network mangement policy not the hardware/software capabilities - I know all those.

When simultaneous transmissions from multiple subscribers result in a total demand for capacity that exceeds exceeding that available on the network, the result is congestion.

The question is whether somebody paying for a higher "speed" plan receives higher priority than someone who does not when both have not exceeded their data usage threshold.

Conversely if both have exceeded their data usage threshold, does one receive higher priority over the other.

Obviously if one has and the other hasn't exceeded their data usage threshold, the answer is (or at least should be) obvious - although from the looks of things around here in this community that may not be so obvious.

When there's sufficient network capacity it's a non-issue.

It's really a question of what you're paying for when opting with a higher speed plan and that has never been made clear by Viasat since the introduction of higher "speeds" starting with the WiFi modem - being capable of higher speeds is of little use if the network capacity isn't there to begin with.

P.S. For me it's not an issue other than determining what the extra $$$ really buy me. The "speed" (a marketing misnomer since it's the theoretical maximum amount of data that can be transferred per second not how fast a bit is travelling) isn't the issue.

As best I can determine, the real difference between unlimited plans is the data usage threshold before (de)prioritization and the "speed" at which detected videos are throttled; however, simultaneous multiple activities (or multiple simulataneous users) may benefit from the increased "speed".

In fact, I recall numerous examples right here where folks upgrade to higher speed plans (at an extra cost for the Wifi Modem with speed boos) expecting that it would increase their speeds during prime time (after all I'm paying for higher speed) - needless to say it didn't. They proably did get some rocking "speeds" during the daytime - but of course weren't home to enjoy them. Any ISP (not just Viasat) touting bandwidth as speed is misleading it's subscribers. Folks would do well to determine how much "speed" they really need before assuming the more the better:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+much+internet+speed+is+enough   

and opinion varies based on individual needs (the nerd wallet hit is probably the best for the layman and at least uses the proper metaphor from a quick review).
(Edited)
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: Viasat's network management policy

Telephone users will most likely get FIFO service (First In First Out)...Their legal eagles then indicate Web browsing, etc....as a function of "fair share” of that capacity."

Cisco's equipment, when "fair shared" programmed for QOS, with stream rates being weighted,

LD 360p 4G Mobile @ H.264 main profile 700 kbps (6 MB/minute)
SD 480p WiFi @ H.264 main profile 1200 kbps (10 MB/minute)
HD 720p @ H.264 high profile 2500 kbps (20 MB/minute)
HD 1080p @ H.264 high profile 5000 kbps (35 MB/minute)

will  bump users downward, from their chosen plan, as congestion increases.  This is how it works on that small town cable system.  "Fair share" connotes all users will share the "pain," but in proportion to their plan's bit rate.  Rank has its privileges.

Viasat says, "If you have any questions about...Viasat’s network management practices, please...contact customer service at 1-855-463-9333."

And I say, programming CISCO's QOS is a skill, and requires a person's full undivided attention to get it right.  I would suspect SNAFUs are not uncommon....and then when programmed theoretically, Internet bottlenecks may screw the programming pooch.
Photo of Brad

Brad, Viasat Employee

  • 3519 Posts
  • 1320 Reply Likes
Hi Patty 

Please call us at 855-463-9333 if you are having issues with the service or email viasatlistens@viasat.com

With that said 7mbps on a 12mbps plan isn't quite a concern as many activities can be done at that speed. Keep in mind that peak hours and some of the late night hours are busier times for our network and speeds usually dip during those times. Speed is never a guarantee as many factors such as network traffic, your connection, your equipment, the site you're going to, the host of the site, how many devices are connected, ect all can affect your speed hence why all ISPs post speeds as "up to". 
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Correction Brad, it's not quite a concern anymore. https://www.exede.com/fcc-rating/
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Ronald:

FCC's Test:

Download speed: Measures the download speed of each whitebox in 5 second intervals within a 30 second time interval, every 2 hours.

Upload speed: Measures the upload speed of each whitebox in 5 second intervals within a 30 second time interval, every 2 hours.

A weighted median for each service tier (weighted by subscriber counts for the tiers) is used to determine the overall ISP download speed.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Was I supposed to read that? They were number 1 in these tests in 2013 https://www.exede.com/blog/fccreport/ They deliver speed as advertised in 2015. Maybe 2018 will be the return to bragging?
Photo of Mark here

Mark here

  • 88 Posts
  • 27 Reply Likes
Let's hope
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: "supposed to read that?"

The tests run on 24 hour cycles...at 2 hour intervals, which means lower primetime speeds are mixed in total data.

For me, primetime dips, but otherwise speeds are fine.

In dialup days, the same pattern...primetime sucked badly, but after the pilgrims went to bed, speeds then were good in Kbps, some 26 or so Kbps.

Unless a person has FIOS/FTTH, or really fast cable, everything else tends to have similar primetime behavior. 

During Wildblue days, getting a web page to load was time-consuming during primetime.  Video streaming, for get it.  Wildblue investors stuffed those beams.

My pattern today is to mostly do web surfing during primetime, then later, do vid watching/downloading.  Still on Exede-5 plan, with 10 Gig bucket, and LNFZ.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
So no?
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4367 Reply Likes
No, unless you're really interested in statistics only gathered through September 2015. The year of the report only covers information obtained through September of the prior year as I read it. The Executive Summary has some interest I suppose from an historical perspective I suppose.
 
It'll be 2019 before a report covers how we're doing this year and we'll all probably know firsthand on our own by then - your tax dollars at work buit I'm more interested in shrimp ruunning on treadmills ;)    
(Edited)
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Viasatcon 2018 - What we bragged about in the past is not relevant today. Ignore the higher quality of service we had but smile about our lower quality of service but higher data plans.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: Viasatcon 2018

Rush hour traffic does suck, especially in cities like St. Louis, Dallas, LA, etc.

Yeah, here's an example: Righteous Brothers Edition

One's perspective is narrowly focused upon an ISP's primetime performance, and is without an awareness of previous sat history, for consumers.  As indicated, when Viasat bought Wildblue, in 2009. Wildblue's execs had "slugged" a number of beams with too many customers (where higher population densities existed).  Viasat terminated new sales in those beams, for many months.  Even in my Exede-5 beam today,


and, it has been this way since commercial aircraft came onboard, several years ago.

Flashback

2007-Nov-30 - If you look in the DSL and cable forums, you will find plenty of people on oversold networks getting a fraction of advertised speeds during peak hours. The CR's say the same thing to them, it's their computer.

2008-Feb-24 - Hughes, Wildblue,Starband, Skywayusa ALL SUCK

This last cite, was very true for those in populated beams...Suck means an user waited/waited for a web page to load during primetime...Real Suck...but during non prime hours, speeds were better, and much better, after midnight.

Currently, Viasat  is attempting in the near future "to provide that cable-like experience," but until big commercial/government accounts and aircraft are off-loaded to VS-2, performance will not change much on VS-1.  There will be primetime dips, but at other times, in most all beams, performance will be good.

One point to bear in mind, streaming went "viral" and was disruptive to all ISPs.

August 23, 2012 - Video streaming problems: Who's to blame, ISP or computer?

With land based ISPs, they can upgrade their infrastructure, with satellite ISPs, a new satellite would have to be lauched.  VS-1 was operational in 2012, when streaming was gaining momentum.  February 14, 2005 is when Youtube was started, and VS-1 was in design stages several years later.  As article above indicates in 2012, streaming was sucking to land based users.

Turn off streaming, and VS-1 would have plenty of bandwidth.  Hence, streaming went ballistic, and Viasat is attempting to address this issue with vid bit rates plans.

Footnote - I went to Google's Video Quality Report, and noticed this



Could there be a reason why Google says this?  Streaming is "off the charts," and all satellite ISPs have a fixed bandwidth per each satellite.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
You are comparing Viasat with residential IP's. I am comparing Viasat with, strangely enough, viasat. Degraded QoS in comparison to prior years in 2018. Your argument is that in 2012, in the early days of a disruptive technology, unprepared land based ISPs were providing poor service. In comparison in 2012 viasat's product paled in comparison to these land based isp's. It still does actually. However it had a high and consistent QoS in 2012. And just in case you want to mention it again, Viasat is better than dial up. Direcway's one way satellite was also better than dial up (though it used dial up for uplink) to offer another hollow argument that has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. I get it, you are happy with your 10gb plan, that you don't care that all of the hype about viasat 2 fell to nothing so far, and that the long term degradation of viasat doesn't bother you. -golf clap-
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: " in 2012 viasat's product paled in comparison to these land based isp's."

Support your assertion...VS-1 came "online" then. I cited this: August 23, 2012 - Video streaming problems: Who's to blame, ISP or computer?

Now This: Jan 21, 2013  An obscenely slow Internet connection when you're paying for a fast one - Interronator is paying Time Warner for 20mbps Internet service, but is only getting about .7 (note the decimal point).

I believe your beef is about primetime...well in the rush hour, we have the

Righteous Brothers Edition

and the

Extreme road rage caught on camera

Major complaints I am aware of is related to streaming, not web browsing...during primetime hours.  Last I knew in most all beams, Viasat performs well in non-primetime hours.  Streaming is the issue, in primetime hours.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
Footnote Jan 21, 2013  Almost no one gets the Internet performance that their ISP advertises.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Related to streaming? Interesting, so there goes that whole bit about the loss of net neutrality not changing anything... I wasn't complaining about primetime. Though its ridiculous when 2mpbs constitutes upto 25mbps in primetime, it's also ridiculous that out of primetime 12 or less often constitutes upto 25mbps on a wired connection. While, as your wisdom would provide, this is faster than dialup or sending smoke symbols, it is slower than the 12 mbps I got all day long on my liberty plan, my evolution plan, and all the prior plans I've had since 2012. Now it's fast than sending messages with a chalk board but it has a lesser QoS than it had when Viasat used to take pride in what it offered to customers. But you assume it's about primetime so insert reference about road rage. There's all the hype amounting to bunk.  There's the overall degradation of their custom service since 2012. Yes, it's true, they will never make me a speaker at Viasatcon 2018.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 1161 Posts
  • 164 Reply Likes
RE: "...loss of net neutrality..."

Read legal terms of service...FCC allowed:.

FCC Open Internet Order 2010 - The Open Internet Order "creates two classes of internet access, one for fixed-line providers and the other for the wireless Net."[1] These regulations adopt an aggressive net neutrality stance towards fixed line broadband providers but a more lenient approach towards wireless providers.

RE: "ridiculous when 2mpbs"

Read Viasat's legal....I most likely have a 2005 copy, but the fine print has indicated primetime slowdowns will exist.

It's not "ridiculous," as stated before, Viasat is attempting to bring a better service.  As since Wildblue days, it has slowly gotten better.  Streaming is what has created bottlenecks...it has gone ballistic...DirecTV/DISH/Youtube/Vimeo/, and many more options.

RE: road rage

Like I said, I do web browsing, email, during primetime mostly.  Vids mostly during LNFZ, or in non-primetime.  Expectations and reality are not always in sync, and those expecting upto speeds during primetime are Internet illiterate.

As noted before (above)

"However, during prime time (about 7PM to 11PM) I see very much lower speeds. Sometimes less than 100Mbps and very often less than 150Mbps, never goes up to 200Mbps."

25% to 50% speed reduction on a fast cable 200Mbps plan during primetime
(Edited)
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 329 Posts
  • 127 Reply Likes
Something about wildblue and things got better: I think that was covered under dial up being faster than smoke signals. Yes Viasat 1 is faster than the much older wildblue satellite. It is also faster than the other gen 3 satellites. Viasat is attempting to bring better quality? Interesting and in their efforts they have made things a worse quality in every single avenue of their business. I'm sorry but honestly I have to ignore the other apologetics with a TLDR since they really don't attempt to address anything I've said in any honest manner. Good day.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.