Someone needs to talk to us consumers!
- 12 Posts
- 9 Reply Likes
- Annoyed
Posted 9 months ago
- 229 Posts
- 109 Reply Likes
- 482 Posts
- 267 Reply Likes
- 12 Posts
- 9 Reply Likes
- 482 Posts
- 267 Reply Likes
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 4 Posts
- 5 Reply Likes
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion
- 3180 Posts
- 2047 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Well, Viasat Satellite Internet Review, says, "Speeds will slow to between 1 and 5 Mbps if you use all of your priority data on the Liberty and Freedom plans..."
And they say, ".... based on objective analysis.....The information in our reviews could be different from what you find ...."
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 482 Posts
- 267 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Someone needs to contact Viasat Satellite Internet Review Their "review" is outdated, and does not reflect current conditions.
It's rather doubtful Viasat will set them straight
- 422 Posts
- 438 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
I will finish the contract and then return to DSL. If lousy service is the norm, I at least want to minimize its cost.
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
But, Viasat Satellite Internet Review says, "Speeds will slow to between 1 and 5 Mbps if you use all of your priority data on the Liberty and Freedom plans..."
Please, bring them up to date...and also, tell them how "speeds upto" works.
PS: Good Read - "First, that starting in 2012, TWC began aggressively pushing customers to sign up for higher-priced internet-service subscriptions for ostensibly faster speeds — speeds the company knew it couldn’t deliver because its hardware was old and its infrastructure was decaying."
- 422 Posts
- 438 Reply Likes
Maybe you should do that Jab, briong them up to date - you seem to be obsessed with that review. Here's a bunch of good reads for you and feel free to provide them to reviews.com:
https://www.exede.com/legal/
Perhaps you should also inform all of the other "review" sites which typically state Viasat is one of the top satellite internet providers in the US - not all that difficult to achieve, but they're also in the bottom 2.
I stay within my priority data up until the last 3 days the month at worst and have no problems.
- 422 Posts
- 438 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 439 Posts
- 151 Reply Likes
- 439 Posts
- 151 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
My usage habits are my business not yours. If that is your best comment, best just to keep quiet.
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion
- 3180 Posts
- 2047 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
In Wildblue days, about all that could be done during primetime was basic web surfing. Today, with bloated web pages, at your speeds, you could clean your house, wash dishes, brush your teeth, etc., and then the web page might appear.
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
The big difference is that DSL was $40/month compared to $75 for Viasat, so from a value perspective I have to give the nod to DSL. If your service is going to suck, it is better to have it suck for $40/month than $75/month. However, I read the Viasat contract before signing up and I had heard the stories for years about how bad satellite was, so I did take the chance with my eyes open. I just was hoping for a little better outcome. However, I will suffer through the remaining 20 months of my contract and then probably try Netbuddy as a number of folks in my area are having better experience with that than they have had with DSL, Satellite or a Verizon Jetpack.
The main thing is that unlike my experience the first 10 weeks or so with Viasat, I am no longer recommending that anyone in my area try it. I was telling people for the first two months that it was working fairly well as it was giving me Liberty pass speeds in the advertised 1-5 Mbps range. However, for the last month or so now, the speeds are consistently below 1 Mbps during prime time and I simply can’t recommend such lousy service to anyone (at least not anyone I like!).
So, Viasat has lost a proponent in this part of the country. Not that they care.
Just for grins, here is my performance tonight. Barely enough for email and light web browsing. This is a fair bit worse than was my typical evening DSL performance, disconnects aside.

- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 537 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Rural telco lines can be cleaned up, but Frontier may or may not be required to do it, by your state regulators.
Local AT&T here, the techs sometimes flip lines used, and then somebody else gets bad phone service.
Sometimes, its a matter of inspecting and cleaning up all connection points...one by one. If living in an area with lots of rain, I would suspect moisture is the issue.
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 3 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
The best that ViaSat will do for me is change plans and get a new modem/gateway. The new modem is considerably faster, and because of this they no longer offer the FREEDOM plan and the new plans are for minimal data.
I’m sure I’m not the only tech savvy customer that knows this is wrong.
Brad, Viasat Employee
- 3520 Posts
- 1321 Reply Likes
- 12 Posts
- 9 Reply Likes
Brad, Viasat Employee
- 3520 Posts
- 1321 Reply Likes
1. Has a free time to begin with (a lot don't)
2. If you're on a legacy plan that was impacted by a policy change a few months ago if not
You can email us at viasatlistens@viasat.com and we'll take a look for you and see what's going on.
- 422 Posts
- 438 Reply Likes
Presumably, those heavier data users (or new customers) are now leveraging or learning to leverage the free zone to meet their data needs - the free zones become peak usage periods just as they eventually did when everybody had a free zone on Exede initially from 0000 - 0500. The problem with free stuff is that you eventually run out of it once folks discover it and take advantage of it.
People simply adjust to the new reality by modifying their usage patterns over time.
Christine Conrad, Champion
- 277 Posts
- 324 Reply Likes
It was a good switch for us. Speeds immediately returned to those we were used to, and in the days following the switch, we were already on "the pass", but speeds were still better than what we were getting on the Freedom plan.
We are a family of 3, my husband and I plus our 10 year old daughter, who has a Chromebook. Once our new cycle started, we have been watching our data usage, but are keeping within budget and are quite pleased with the service.
I know there are many people who are upset with this data policy change, but for me, I know things can change, especially things we really have no control over. Things have happened in my life that have caused me to make major adjustments, and presented huge challenges to my everyday life, but I have overcome them, mostly because I can accept the fact that sometimes things change.
Am I totally pleased with how Viasat changed their data policy for the 150GB plans, definitely not. My hope is that in the future something better will come along, either from Viasat or another ISP.
- 4 Posts
- 5 Reply Likes
- 12 Posts
- 9 Reply Likes
- 161 Posts
- 74 Reply Likes

- 422 Posts
- 438 Reply Likes
GabeU, Champion
- 2231 Posts
- 1364 Reply Likes
Diana, Viasat Employee
- 2409 Posts
- 474 Reply Likes
- 470 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 325 Posts
- 104 Reply Likes
- 37 Posts
- 11 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
"FTC can punish US companies for unfair or deceptive practices," so is priority defined?
From hearsay conversations here, it appears those on the VS-1 150 gig plan get penalized more than those on smaller gig plans.
- 324 Posts
- 104 Reply Likes
- 37 Posts
- 11 Reply Likes
- 2453 Posts
- 2183 Reply Likes
- 324 Posts
- 104 Reply Likes
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 481 Posts
- 267 Reply Likes
- 469 Posts
- 141 Reply Likes
The reality is the satellite internet is only useful if you have absolutely no other option. I thought Frontier DSL was as bad as could possibly be, but I apparently was wrong as Viasat appears to be at least as bad and possibly worse performance-wise and definitely is a poorer value given the much higher cost. Unfortunately, I currently have no other options so I am stuck.
I just have to bide my time until my co-op’s fiber comes through. The good news is that many RECs are now looking to deploy fiber. This will remove a lot of current satellite customers which will hopefully help out those who remain and truly have no other options.
My current speed is faster than the last several evenings, but still only about half of what my DSL speed used to be (it ran 1-1.5 Mbps during prime time). So, if you have DSL or wireless and you get prime time speeds above 0.5 Mbps, don’t subscribe to Viasat as you likely will be worse off.

- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
@ Stephen Rice said about one year ago, "You people are out of your mind for crying about the possibility of speeds slowing after using up your priority data on the new plans."
- 893 Posts
- 536 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Classic 10 is still good in beam I use, but 10 gig bucket limits activity to web browsing with some video clips during normal hours. Upgrading to a $100.00+ "unlimited" plan, with restricted video resolution is not a solution. I'm using a 27" monitor...360p does not look good
I believe when traffic policy for VS-1's "150giggers" was reprogrammed, they appear to have SNAFU it, unless marching orders were given to penalize these folks.
I think its clear what happened...they shifted more bandwidth to aircraft in select beams. This was done some years ago also, but with VS-2, some VS-1 beams got relief from aircraft traffic, which shifted over to VS-2 usage in select areas. Each VS-2 beam was planned for....VS is fully aware of aircraft flight paths.
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 229 Posts
- 108 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 536 Reply Likes
- 1551 Posts
- 913 Reply Likes
- 893 Posts
- 536 Reply Likes
- 12 Posts
- 9 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
The beam I use is fine, but 10gig is not enough for watching video clips I want to watch during normal hours. Currently, I'm paying for two ISPs, one sat and one wireless, for about the same amount of money required for their current base "unlimited" plan, $100.00/month
Within six months, I'll either keep both, or drop sat. With wireless, "they" can track you better...with Sat having changing IP addresses, "they" can't unless I leave them cookies to feast upon.
- 1 Post
- 0 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Their website is suggesting they have VS-1 and VS-2 services in your area, which logically, is false. I would see if a COOP/REA offers this service in your area first, and if not, then call them, and ask what plans they have available.
Then, come back here, and ask your question to a Viasat employee about beam loading in your area.
- 3 Posts
- 0 Reply Likes
The best that ViaSat will do for me is change plans and get a new modem/gateway. The new modem is considerably faster, and because of this they no longer offer the FREEDOM plan and the new plans are for minimal data.
I’m sure I’m not the only tech savvy customer that knows this is wrong.
- 1551 Posts
- 913 Reply Likes
Viasat might be your best internet option. Then again it might not be. All depends on your location and what other internet options are available to you!
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes

- 1613 Posts
- 939 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
GabeU, Champion
- 2248 Posts
- 1374 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
I chat with someone who was part of the original Athena Visual Computing Group at MIT, and he is still on dialup. He's retired and lives in a rural area in Nova Scotia, so dialup is the option he chooses. He was a skilled programming geek, and he's using scripts/etc to fetch web text content, and when needed, he takes his laptop to town for download/etc.
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
I think his interests now, besides computer stuff, are "blacksmithing, gardening, chainsawing, cooking, mechanicing, welding, reading books like Niall Ferguson's book, _The Square & the Tower_., and looking up words like kayfabe, which he perceives as being currently of a well known US character.
- 229 Posts
- 109 Reply Likes
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
@Al, I can read and send email fairly well, which is my highest priority, and browse the web, albeit slowly particularly on sites with lots of graphics. What I can’t do, which is a pain, is watch YouTube videos. I use them a lot for “how to” info on things like appliance repair and that is nearly impossible between noon and midnight. And watching Netflix, AcornTV or Hulu is pretty much out of the question until after 11 PM and before noon. Hulu is particularly bad as it handles the slow speeds more poorly than the others. Netflix and Acorn buffer a lot, but always keep going, albeit glacially. Hulu just seems to give up and quit.
- 229 Posts
- 109 Reply Likes
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
FWIW, here's a former PIP (previously important person) who transformed his lifestyle at retirement into a "a seasonal Park Ranger/EMT in Yellowstone National Park" for past 14 years.
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
@Jab, Great video. I had not seen that before and I watch quite a few TED talks, at least when I am somewhere with a decent internet connection. Fortunately, I travel a fair bit and have video capable internet access at least a few days a month at hotels and such. I haven’t taken a full-time job since retiring from the corporate world as did this man did, but I did join the boards of three electric companies and am the chairman of the board of the REC that serves my home. I have played a fairly key role in getting the cooperatives fiber project underway. It helped that I retired from the world’s foremost optical fiber maker.
- 1161 Posts
- 164 Reply Likes
Apparently, Viasat was a blessing in terms of stimulating your drive to enrich your area with broadband. I tried last year to get a rural Telco motivated to come inside AT&T's turf, where I live, but either the CSR did or did not inform the brass that they could do it. I should have talked to the man and laid out it was legal to do, and they could receive FCC funding if they won the auction...which they used previously for their turf.
I know of another rural Telco that was clueless on this point...you can't lay POTs in another telco's turf, but you can lay fiber if the incumbent telco is not bidding in this last auction.
- 472 Posts
- 142 Reply Likes
And Frontier was my provider for 20 years or so and was my main motivation.
- 370 Posts
- 147 Reply Likes
- 1618 Posts
- 942 Reply Likes
Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion
- 3180 Posts
- 2047 Reply Likes
- 370 Posts
- 147 Reply Likes
- 370 Posts
- 147 Reply Likes
- 1618 Posts
- 942 Reply Likes
GabeU, Champion
- 2248 Posts
- 1375 Reply Likes
Speaking of annoying why do you keep posting your speeds over and over again?It proves we're all "whinners"!
- 128 Posts
- 61 Reply Likes
- 370 Posts
- 147 Reply Likes
GabeU, Champion
- 2248 Posts
- 1375 Reply Likes
Still, testmy is what I mostly use, as it can be trusted.
- 1618 Posts
- 942 Reply Likes
The fact if it is cloudy or not does not matter.
GabeU, Champion
- 2248 Posts
- 1375 Reply Likes
- 1618 Posts
- 942 Reply Likes
- 370 Posts
- 147 Reply Likes
GabeU, Champion
- 2248 Posts
- 1375 Reply Likes
You were right before you edited your post :)No doubt, but rather than have the powers that be close this thread, too, I figured I'd just delete the descriptives.
- 1618 Posts
- 942 Reply Likes
Related Categories
-
Exede Internet-Classic
- 488 Conversations
- 991 Followers
Gwen
Jab
See...no speed here
a_concerned_customer
Nathan Hart
Al Santayos
BaeBae125524
Dan Pitisci
The best that ViaSat will do for me is change plans and get a new modem/gateway. The new modem is considerably faster, and because of this they no longer offer the FREEDOM plan and the new plans are for minimal data.
I’m sure I’m not the only tech savvy customer that knows this is wrong.
Rona R. Brown
Will Seemore
ExSatUser
CP
They won't tell you directly that but that is exactly how it works. High data plans and advertised speed are smoke and mirrors. An example of how they do it is as follows: They can group 1000 people with 150GB plans together and allow that group 1% of their bandwidth on a spot beam. They take another group of 10 25GB users and give them 99% of the bandwidth on the same spot beam. Of course those with the higher GB plans have extreme slowdowns and the others little speed decrease. "Network congestion" is artificially induced by grouping a lot of people to a small % of bandwidth so "network congestion" is really however they design it and can be artificially changed by who they group together.
Old Labs
Actually they do describe it in the Network Management Policy at:
https://www.exede.com/documents/master/network-management-policy.pdf
As an aside and from a historical perspective, that document was first published right around the time of the Open Internet order adoption (Net Neutrality) in 2015 and was a document required by the FCC to inform consumers of ISP network management practices.Viasat has continued to update it over time and the first mention of these high data usage "channels" as I recall was around the policy change to Freedom and pre-February 2018 Unlimited plans. Those are the high data thresholds being described in that context. I don't believe Unlimited Platinum falls into that classification despite its 150GB threshold.
It's worth a read to understand what's going on regardless of how one feels about the policies. By understanding it, you might be able to make a more informed (less emotional) decision on how to deal with it regardless of where each of us stands on the issue - i.e. keep your plan, switch plans or drop Viasat.
FWIW if you followed the quarterly conference calls, at one point it was explicitly stated that around 20,000 subscribers adopted those early, misguided unlimited plans having 150GB. Freedom plan subscriber counts were never really published but assuming a similar number, the vast majority of the stated 577,000 subscribers at the time were likely on Classic, Liberty, Evolution plans to reflect an ARPU of around $60 and most of them were complaining about their speeds at that time. I can only say with certainty that my Liberty plan got better with the change and for those reasons I'm inclined to accept the official response targeting the majority of customers and given 8 months ago although others surely will disagree:
Viasat prematurely painted themselves into a corner with those high data thresholds on Viasat-1 before the Viasat-2 issues became known.
ExSatUser
Old Labs
and the Pirates of the Caribbean eat the tourists.
CP
It would be the same as making ALL the cars on a 5 lane highway (us "high data users") ONLY use the one carpool lane and letting the carpool lane cars (lower data users) use ALL the other 5 lanes. Doesn't really seem right does it?
Do you work for them?
Old Labs
Old Labs
Old Labs
Again read the entire network management policy along with the usage policy document for your plan and not just that excerpt - the link's above. There's much more to it than the simplified explanation you'll get over the phone.
CP
That's really what is occurring despite a wordy data policy...right?? You have to agree that 0.2 to 0.4Mbps is slower than is reasonable for what they advertise...that's what I get at night frequently now. Never happened before the policy change so its an artificially low speed intended to punish the old plan purchasers. They advertise their slowest, after data cap speed as 1-5Mbps which is less than I get frequently (but still get 25+Mbps in the daytime).
Admiral Korbohuta
GabeU, Champion
Admiral Korbohuta
Homeskillet
Old Labs
Yes that's what the new policy says for all intents and purposes for those having Freedom or Unlimited Plans acquired before February 13, 2018. My first reaction to the change was, in fact, so priority data is meaning less during congested periods. I'm not here to defend it nor debate the fairness of life, but you're all over the place and it's not even clear what plan you're on and when you acquired it. There are plenty of folks here more than willing to debate the fairness or sympathize - that's not going to change the reality.
If on one of those plans, Viasat has made it clear what your options are: keep it (hopefully you can limit use to non-peak hours), change plans or leave - simple as that. If that's you, make an informed decision. Only you are in the position to determine what's best for your circumstances.
That's not news at this point. What is new at this point is that the policy change is starting to affect others who were previously unaffected on those plans as Viasat continues to add new subs to their beam.
It was a horrible policy change. Does that make you feel better?