read all execede customers

  • 2
  • Question
  • Updated 6 months ago
  • Acknowledged
Data De-Prioritization – The Back of the Line With data de-prioritization, the carrier isn’t limiting the customer’s data. Instead, the carrier has the option of pushing a heavy user’s data requests behind those of other users if there is a large amount of network traffic. It’s a way for the carrier to ensure that all its users are able to use data, and provide a high-quality experience for the majority of its customers. De-prioritization, like throttling, kicks in when a user reaches a certain data threshold. For unlimited data plans, this threshold is usually anywhere from 22 GB to 30 GB. However, unlike data throttling which starts immediately upon reaching a data threshold and lasts until the end of the cycle, data de-prioritization only occurs when there is high network congestion. The two most common causes of network congestion are a large number of people using data in a small area, or a large number of people using data around the same time. For example, if a user reaches his data threshold, he can expect his carrier to deprioritize him during peak data usage hours, or if he’s in an area with quite a few people also using data. Once it’s no longer a peak data usage time or when he leaves that heavily populated area, he should see an increase in data speeds. How Throttling and Data De-Prioritization Are Different To use a car analogy, the user’s data plan is like a car driving on a freeway with a speed limit of 70 miles per hour. The car can switch lanes to find one that has the least amount of traffic and keep going as fast as possible. Throttling is akin to the speed limit dropping to 20 miles per hour. The car must go this speed until the speed limit goes back up, just like the user has that slower data speed until a new plan cycle starts. Data de-prioritization would be if the speed limit remained at 70 miles per hour, but the car could only drive in one lane. Provided the lane wasn’t congested, the car could still go 70 miles per hour, but if it was congested, the car could end up going 20 miles per hour, even if traffic in the other lanes was still going 70. Until the traffic in that lane cleared, the car would be limited to that slower speed, just like the user is limited to the slower data speed until congestion clears up. Jump to top
Photo of Shannon Williams

Shannon Williams

  • 39 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes

Posted 7 months ago

  • 2
Photo of Bradley

Bradley

  • 1083 Posts
  • 352 Reply Likes
I mean, yeah, this is what we are told. I’m afraid the DOT didn’t plan well and only built two lane, heavily traveled roads in my beam.
Photo of Dina Hess

Dina Hess

  • 49 Posts
  • 19 Reply Likes
Very well explained, both of you. 

I specifically followed the roadsigns to be certain that I took the exit for the interstate, but instead I was still shunted onto that heavily traveled 2-lane. The DOT just shrugs and says it's not their problem that they didn't label the exit correctly.  
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 148 Posts
  • 99 Reply Likes
Throttled, restricted, 2 lane, 4 lane 8 lane, blah, blah, blah, none of it matters when the road is already overcrowded and more and more cars are trying to get on at every entrance ramp.  They entice new business and residents to come to the area with the promise of a new road that will solve the problem well into the future, but that road is still under construction.  This makes the old road a living nightmare

When you are sitting in traffic barely moving, youve finished your coffee and are late for work, the guy beside you is laying on the horn because he wants your spot ... does it really matter that the posted speed limit is 55 MPH?
Photo of Frank Alvarez

Frank Alvarez

  • 23 Posts
  • 11 Reply Likes
At least on this highway you're close to a bathroom when you have to poop! 
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 406 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
RE: At least on this highway

Viasat's 14 million Wi-Fi Hotspots are without bathrooms.
Photo of Bradley

Bradley

  • 1083 Posts
  • 352 Reply Likes
Interesting article for a change Jab. Thanks. On my undead mother’s grave, I’ll go bananas if ViaSat delivers faster speeds and more reliable (read reliable as able to count on sufficient speeds whenever I go to use it) service to Mexico before North Carolina.

I’m about to tweet Elon to hurry every chance he gets.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 3356 Posts
  • 1928 Reply Likes
Well... actually Europe has been running on the same technology Viasat 1 uses for awhile, with bigger data caps from its inception.

Look up Tooway.
Photo of Mark here

Mark here

  • 80 Posts
  • 23 Reply Likes
Basically, if you run out of priority minutes and your on a congested beam look forward to speeds like this....
Speed Test Result
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 3359 Posts
  • 1929 Reply Likes

I got three times that speed ON priority data last night.

On a Saturday at 6PM I am pulling this...  Download :: 662 kbps


When it is less than 1Mbps, everything is pretty slow.

(Edited)
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 148 Posts
  • 99 Reply Likes
I really dont trust the speeds that much.  I dont download a lot or do a lot of streaming, I want "internet access" and when I cant perform simple tasks like open mail or check Facebook there is a problem.

I am becoming agitated because the past 1 1/2 weeks or so my free zone speed has only been 7 Mbps or less.  Thats about half what it was previously.  Regardless of "speed" I am going SLOW all night long now.  I wait until late night to watch a video and now I have to click 3 or 4 times before it will load, and once it does, the buffering begins!  Didnt have this problem a month ago.  Things are  definitely getting worse.
Photo of Mark here

Mark here

  • 80 Posts
  • 23 Reply Likes
If it wasn't for US Cellular I would be living in the Dark Ages. When I get de-prioritized I get.....
 this result
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 148 Posts
  • 99 Reply Likes
LOL Mark.  If we go upstairs and stand by the south facing window we can get 3 bars on Verizon at times.  AT&T is a complete dead zone.  We use Straight Talk and must be sure any phone we purchase has the Verizon chip in it or we get NOTHING.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 3356 Posts
  • 1928 Reply Likes
You most likely are on beam 320. That woukd be the most congested beam Viasat has. Viasat-2 was to have some features to help hard hit areas like ours. It remains to see if that will come to pass, given all the issues it appears they are having with it now.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 406 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
RE: "turned on video saver the day it came out"

I've turned it off, and if one is getting "7 Mbps or less" during LNFZ with it on, that's interesting.  I thought throttling would happen all the time

13 February 2006 - “We’ve been shocked at the level of demand in a region including parts of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois and New York,” said Erwin C. Hudson, WildBlue’s chief technology officer. “To preserve the quality of the service for our existing customers, we are no longer accepting new subscribers on these two beams.

Video streaming has grown and grown...that's why video throttling plans exist today.

I try to download video, when possible, during non-primetimes, and do web-surfing during primetimes.  Video sites I'm aware of tend to use much slower speeds than 7Mbps.

From looking at updated Viasat maps, it appears first two satellites (Anik-F2 & WB-1) have active beams in western states, with none eastward.  If true, this suggests none of these beams are in your area, and all eastern users got transferred to VS-1.

So, maybe in another month or two, VS-2 might offer relief, if its possible to get onboard.  When VS-1 launched, new customers were "welcomed," but existing Wildblue customers had to wait.  It might be different in crowded beams.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 3356 Posts
  • 1928 Reply Likes
Nothing like posting a link that is a decade+ old.

Thanks....for the call.
(Edited)
Photo of Dina Hess

Dina Hess

  • 49 Posts
  • 19 Reply Likes
Ron Frank, I agree that we desperately need some TRUTHFULNESS from this company.  

I'm one of those new subscribers they never should have added. They sold me Viasat 2 and I didn't find out until installation was nearly complete that that wasn't what was being installed (when I saw the incorrect modem come out, which I only knew to identify due to this forum). I immediately objected to both the installer and the company but got nothing but a collective shrug and a reminder that I have a 2 year contract.

I don't understand how this is legal, honestly.  If I go to buy a car and spend a month shopping around before selecting one, then hand over a check to buy the one I choose, *I get the car I chose*.  Not some other random car, with the defense being that the one I picked actually isn't on the lot after all.  Consumers can't make reasonable choices about what they are buying when companies deliberately misrepresent the product.  

Furthermore, they specifically told me during the sales process that they 'never' oversell their service unlike other companies, and that we'd have a bare minimum of 5 Mbps even if we hit deprioritization.  Instead I see evening speeds typically measured in kbps even on priority data, daytime speeds somewhat better but still often under 1 Mbps, and if we run out of priority data (we are in the process of setting up a new computer, which requires a very frustrating amount of downloading), then it's essentially unusable.


 
Photo of Ron Frank

Ron Frank

  • 148 Posts
  • 99 Reply Likes
Jab, The extent of my "video" watching is video posts my friends share in FB or an occasional stiff drink and rocking out to some Youtube music videos on the home theater system.  I dont do TV streaming or movies, and I am NOT an online gamer. 

My LNFZ speeds are checked when I scroll my FB feed and have to wait for more posts to load, or I click on a post for a local for sale ad then sit and wait for it to load.  The wife and I play a social media game, Forge of Empires and some nights it is horribly slow.  I play on my PC, she does everything on her smart phone, we can both tell when the internet is slow.  Completely different devices, on completely different operating systems and it affects us both, and may be fine in a few hours.  Its safe to say its not on "our end".
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 406 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
When someone uploads videos on BookFace, I have no idea what vid resolution can be seen...but if a higher res during primetime, well.  If one Google's "Facebook Slow," there are multiple reasons.


October 7, 2017: Facebook Incredibly Slow (almost unusable) in Chrome

I actually figured out after doing some more googling. It was being caused by the amount of active session that the account was in on various devices. There were something like 400 active session from as far back as 2012. I ended all of those and it seems to be working fine now.

If anyone else has this issue, all you have to do is go to: Setting > Security, Click on the "Where You're Logged in " tab and end all the sessions.
=======================

If WiFi modem is being used, put a fan on it

LIke I said, I just surf during primetime, and download vids mostly in non-prime hours, mostly LNFZ hours.  There are programs out there to do off hours downloads.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 406 Posts
  • 52 Reply Likes
Woody - "switched to Hughes around a month a go and it smokes Viasat."

Well....do a Testmy.net   Here's mine, with correct time when tested