Is this normal for "unlimited gold" plan after data cap?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 17 hours ago
  • Acknowledged

Photo of fishedo3

fishedo3

  • 7 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 1 year ago

  • 1
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 5133 Posts
  • 3175 Reply Likes
Viasat-1 or 2? What color is your modem?
Photo of fishedo3

fishedo3

  • 7 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
White modem Viasat-2, correct?
Photo of Nathan Hart

Nathan Hart

  • 431 Posts
  • 145 Reply Likes
Gold 30 or gold 50? White or black modem?
Photo of fishedo3

fishedo3

  • 7 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
gold 50 white modem
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 5133 Posts
  • 3175 Reply Likes
Priority data level? 60? 100? 150?
Photo of fishedo3

fishedo3

  • 7 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
100
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 5133 Posts
  • 3175 Reply Likes
Well this isnt good. After 100GB of usage on Viasat-2 your "up to" 50Mbps "unlimited" plan is running at 250kbps.
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4366 Reply Likes
Depending on which content provider you ask, 720p requires anywhere from 2 - 4 Mbps. It really depends on much more than the vertical resolution. Netflix uses adaptive streaming as well as per title optimzation:

https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/per-title-encode-optimization-7e99442b62a2

FWIW, it's all an inexact science when it comes down to it. Consider, the Netflix actual speed recommendations at https://help.netflix.com/en/node/306

Note that HD quality there includes both 720P and 1080P.

(Edited)
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1826 Posts
  • 1141 Reply Likes
Ah, my mistake.  I didn't think they used adaptive streaming.  That's good to know.  
Photo of Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

Old Labs (VS1-329-L12FZ)

  • 4281 Posts
  • 4366 Reply Likes
I think the general consensus around here is that Viasat's throttling is at the bare minimum required for the quality advertised per plan with little room for error on the user experience due to buffering that can't keep up with the streaming rate.  Netwflix tries to balance the quality with the user experience.
(Edited)
Photo of Chris Reynoso

Chris Reynoso

  • 4 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
In my area streaming isn't possible once you reach the data cap. As soon as you hit it they throttle you down to barely usable speeds. The only think you can really do is check email and general web surfing and even that is much slower. Certainly no youtube or video streaming of any sort. This is all day and evening. I believe in the middle of the night it may be better as I was able to set Netflix to record during the night and it worked with minimal buffering but other than that it's pretty weak. Being someone who works remotely it's been a real hassle living in the country. Often I go to the library or a local cafe to conserve my home data for when I really need it and I download streaming shows to my ipad from the library so that I can still watch some shows at home. Less that optimal.
Photo of Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314

Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion

  • 3092 Posts
  • 1983 Reply Likes
Satellite internet is not designed for heavy streaming. If you need your internet for your work, then you need to restrict your streaming to a level that leaves you enough priority data to do your job related internet tasks.

Learn to stay within your priority data limits and you will not have these problems.
Photo of Andy Schack

Andy Schack

  • 854 Posts
  • 760 Reply Likes
Now I'm actually glad I'm not located in a small beam area. 

Andy
Photo of Jamie Thompson

Jamie Thompson

  • 15 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
The throttling is bs. Congestion is bs!
Photo of ExSatUser

ExSatUser

  • 871 Posts
  • 562 Reply Likes
Well you tagged to a year old thread, but Viasat openly throttles video on a number of its plan.

That is what the "video optimzer" is. They throttle back your network speed so you get lower resolution video.

There are ways around it, but that is for another discussion.
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1952 Posts
  • 1201 Reply Likes
Thought it was the weekend there, for a second.  
Photo of ExSatUser

ExSatUser

  • 871 Posts
  • 562 Reply Likes
So old some posters on this thread have dobbelgangers now!
(Edited)
Photo of Captain318

Captain318

  • 38 Posts
  • 10 Reply Likes
It's sad to me that anyone has to say the words Unlimited and Data Cap in the same sentence referring to their service. I'm not talking about just Viasat either. I don't care what ISP it is, it's deceptive marketing and shouldn't be tolerated 
Photo of Jim16

Jim16

  • 2453 Posts
  • 2179 Reply Likes
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 5133 Posts
  • 3175 Reply Likes
I agree. Some company now advertises "truly" "unlimited". Lol
Photo of Rygen

Rygen

  • 6 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I'm a new Viasat customer, and no stranger to Satellite internet.  I've set it up OCONUS at various locations so knew what I was getting into with the latency.  When I moved into this house, I got Viasat before I could put my network gear in place to perform rate limiting, quotas and traffic shaping.  I'm on a small beam, and signal strength is 10-11.7 consistently.  

The installation tech said this satellite and beam were not congested, so we should be fine if we go over the data cap, he goes over his cap all the time and can still stream netflix.  My youngest chewed through 70GB in 4 days.  Thats on us!!!   But I can tell you this is what we got consistently during the month once we were over the limit (Gold, 100GB, Viasat-2).

  • Midnight to 6AM:  20 to 70Mbps
  • 6AM to 3PM:  1Mbps, sometimes 2.5Mbps
  • 3PM to Midnight:  .11 to .25Mbps
You would think 256k is usable - I've made it work when OCONUS, but even with only one device on it I got consistent socket errors and time outs. It wasn't the speed, it was the time outs! I couldn't work in the evenings.

I spent hours on the phone with support, could never get them to tell me if I was on a congested beam.  But I'm certain based on the hourly testing I was running that it was indeed the case.  One tech ran a script to try to move me to a less congested portion of the beam - I'm not sure if that is possible but that didn't help.

After many calls, they sent a tech out as they said I should see 1 to 3Mbps after I hit the cap.  Tech came out, said the dish was off .25 of an inch.  He said the issue was I was over my cap.

I now have my network setup to throttle eveyone, and setup a quota for my youngest, he is allowed 30gb a month, after that I slow him down to 128k - which he is fine with, it allows him to still talk on Discord.  

Bottom line is I would be happy with 265k of unlimited if it didn't time out on me, that is what makes it unusable.  
(Edited)
Photo of Andy Schack

Andy Schack

  • 854 Posts
  • 760 Reply Likes
I'm seeing enough stories like this that I now am telling customers in Small beams that the data cap is hard. 

Rygen, you are correct, at 256k....with the way the system slows you down after you go over your data....you can barely get Google's home page to load properly, I've seen it myself. 

Andy
Photo of Rygen

Rygen

  • 6 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Indeed.  Just one more point, I've worked full time on 256k with 600-700ms, email, voice, web browsing.  Obviously I can't have all three going at the same time.  But if your smart you can make it work.

So its not the bandwidth they are giving me, its the prioritization at that bandwidth.  The time outs correspond with 1800ms.

My hats off to them on the challenge, Viasat and Hughesnet arguably have the most complex QoS implementations on the planet.  I would love to see their DSCP configuration. 

I just hope two things happen...

  • They bring more beams online, I think I read that they have issues with Viasat-2 and not all beams are online.  
  • They stop over subscribing the beams

So for those of you having the same challenge, if your tech savvy, look into home network setup that lets you do rate limiting, quest quotas, and traffic shaping.  I use a unify controller with a few of their AP's for full mesh.  It goes a long way to keep me under 100g.
Photo of Ronald Stricklin

Ronald Stricklin

  • 325 Posts
  • 125 Reply Likes
Yes you should expect crappy service after you go over your data allowance
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 5133 Posts
  • 3175 Reply Likes
I wouldn't have a problem if they slow it that low IF they wouldn't advertise it as "unlimited". It is NOT unlimited. After priority data is used people are getting slowed down to levels the 10, 15 and 25GB plans had. At least those plans had a free zone.

So the best thing to do is to get is most priority data you can afford, and stay under the cap.
Photo of Andy Schack

Andy Schack

  • 854 Posts
  • 760 Reply Likes
You and I see this situation exactly the same. I'm one of those "words mean things" people....gets me into a lot of trouble. 

....and it's NOT a data CAP or ALLOWANCE....it's an inflection point...that is how we are told as dealers to represent it to customers. 

Andy

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.