Faster than dialup

  • 1
  • Praise
  • Updated 7 hours ago
I just downloaded a 248 MB file in less than five minutes.  Can't download stuff that quick with dialup!
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2546 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes

Posted 1 week ago

  • 1
Photo of Michael McDowell

Michael McDowell

  • 535 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Two days ago I was lucky to hit 2Mbps on this speedtest!

Today:


What is going on???
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4498 Posts
  • 2751 Reply Likes
Working towards that median speed :).
Photo of Michael McDowell

Michael McDowell

  • 535 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
That was the first time in over six weeks that it has been that high.  They have a LOT of catching up to do!!  Best test prior to this was about 16Mbps, about 2 weeks ago.  I am on the 30Mbps Gold 150 plan.
(Edited)
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4498 Posts
  • 2751 Reply Likes
Well then you need 60Mbps!

I can get the 30 Gold. Wonder if that would be Viasat-2 or 1? Then I would go from 487kbps to 60Mbps in how many seconds?
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2541 Posts
  • 1309 Reply Likes
If Viasat can’t deliver the speeds you are paying for now, what makes you think giving them more money would make things any better?
Photo of Casual Observer

Casual Observer

  • 152 Posts
  • 145 Reply Likes
An email...
Photo of Sophie Mae

Sophie Mae

  • 71 Posts
  • 38 Reply Likes
Hey Michael... I can't remember whereabouts you live, but I remember we're beam-neighbors. I thought you might find this article interesting:  https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2018/Q3/report-broadband-access-would-benefit-rural-areas,-state.html
(Edited)
Photo of Michael McDowell

Michael McDowell

  • 535 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Sophie Mae...I'm a little SE of Kokomo.  Thanks for sharing that link.  Duke Energy is my electrical supplier.  Saw where someone on here said they were getting fiber within the next week or two.  Sigh!!!    Sure would be nice!!  Have you been impacted much by these Viasat changes?  

edit:   Just read down a bit. Guess johnny c was the one I was talking about!
(Edited)
Photo of Sophie Mae

Sophie Mae

  • 71 Posts
  • 38 Reply Likes
I guess Tipmont REMC is going to start laying fiber in the Romney, Linden, and New Richmond areas to bring broadband to over 1,200 homes: 
https://tipmont.org/news/item/fiber-internet-update

I live in Warren County. I sent an email to our REMC asking if they'd heard about the efforts of Tipmont, etc... and the general manager responded that the board had met to discuss what could be done to get fast internet service in our neck of the woods. I need to touch base with him, as that was several months ago. 

As for the Viasat changes: yes, we've been impacted. The first impact was when Viasat2 was being touted as The Next Best Thing To Sliced BreadTM, then the second impact was with the recent changes to the Freedom and grandfathered "Unlimited" plans (I'm on the Silver 25 150GB plan).

The first impact was most likely due to the beam becoming congested with the unlimited plans which preceded Viasat2 coming online, which I'm sure you noticed, too.

The second impact has left us with speeds so slow during prime time as to be nearly unusable. It's not all that groovy during the day M-F either, but it's allowed me to work from home when I needed to. 

When I first switched over to Viasat from HughesNet, it was fantastic. The first year or so was positively groovy. Then it all kinda went to Hades in a handbasket. :(
Photo of Michael McDowell

Michael McDowell

  • 535 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
Just tested with Speedtest.  Almost 35Mbps down and over 5Mbps up.  Much better than the last few weeks!  Although, this weekend was pretty      s   l   o   w.  I'm on the Gold 30 150 plan.  
Photo of johnny c

johnny c

  • 334 Posts
  • 141 Reply Likes
Back in the 90's i asked one of my students, who worked for Verizon, when could we expect to get DSL out where i live, his response was, "Never", he was correct, never offered in our area.

Tonight, Viasat: 1.5 Mbps down, I've only used 12 G of my 150, too bad it is so pitiful in the evening.

But on a brighter note, the power company came out yesterday and marked the under ground FIOS cable path to my home.  Today they had a couple of crews stringing the FIOS cable from one pole to the next on the state roads and to the last pole on my lane. (the rest will be underground, because i have an underground power line as well, after the last pole they will run the underground for 1000 feet free.  To the pole was free, and since i am 998 feet from that pole the installation is free.)

So probably in 6 to 8 weeks, or sooner we should be on FIOS.

This service was never expected, the Broad Band initiative and the heads up work by our rural power company is making this a reality.

My so called 150G Silver 25 Mbps plan yields reasonable speeds during the day time hours, but as you all know after 5 PM it is ridiculously slow.

I am opting for the 2nd tier FIOS, 100 Mbps, unlimited data for 100 dollars a month.

They have a 50 Mbps, unlimited data for 74 dollars and the 1GB speed plan is 179 dollars a month.

Most Dish and Directv subscribers are cancelling and just doing the a la cart streaming, I'll see the performance before cancelling our Directv..

I hope some of your counties, power companies get with the program.
(Edited)
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1429 Posts
  • 857 Reply Likes
You lucky bugger!!!  Fiber is a dream that will never happen where I live.  I have a better chance of getting cable, and the chance of that is 0.00000001%.  
Photo of Bradley

Bradley

  • 1196 Posts
  • 388 Reply Likes
If the measuring stick is still dial-up in 2019 that should tell you all you need to know folks.
Photo of fmj77

fmj77

  • 551 Posts
  • 334 Reply Likes
The measuring stick is not dial up. Some customers have access to slower DSL connections and prefer to go with Viasat instead.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
What fmj77 said.  I was never using dialup as a measuring stick.  People come here all the time stating that Viasat is slower than dialup.  I was simply pointing out that I could never ever download a 248 mb file so quickly back in the dialup days.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4500 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
Nor were files that big :)

Heck even hard drives were not that big, if you even had one!
(Edited)
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
My first hard drive was on a 386 and was something like 130 mb.  Eventually we upgraded to a 486 with a 1.2 gb hard drive.  Those were the good old days of dialup.  
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4500 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
Think I can remember a 5 or 10MB hard drive back in the early 80's. Was on the schools computer.
Photo of Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314

Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion

  • 2943 Posts
  • 1867 Reply Likes
My first computer was a 286 with 512 KB of memory and a 10 MB hard drive. That was in the mid 80s.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4500 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
I didn't get my first IBM compatible computer until the early 90's. I paid way too much for it. Actually bought it at Sears of all places because of a financing special they had. That was my first computer with a hard drive.

For most of the 80's, I used Atari computers, both the 800 and the ST. They were good for gaming, which I did a LOT back then. Never had a modem where you placed the phone handset on, and never had the cassette loader. They were still available, but going out when I got my first computer.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
Got my first computer at Sears. It was a 100% IBM compatible machine made by Packard Bell.

I’ll never forget the words that were displayed during POST every time you would power up the machine,
“America grew up listening to us, it still does.”
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1438 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
I got my first IBM clone as a gift from my in laws to myself and my wife (now ex).  It was a P166 with 8MB of RAM and a 1.2GB HDD.  This was in 1996, I believe.  

I bought my own first computer in either 1998 or 1999.  It was an eMachines 366i.  A 366Mhz Celeron with 32MB RAM and a 4.3GB HDD.  It was actually a very good computer.  I got it on the cheap with the $400 instant rebate for signing up for three years of MSN dialup, which I would have needed, anyway.  So, it was like getting $400 off for doing nothing.  

And, a sliver lining to choosing that computer is that, years later, there was a class action suit against eMachines that had to do with the floppy drives used on their computers, with the 366i included.  Darn near every model with a floppy drive was included.  You could choose a $62.50 check or $365 worth of computer related merchandise from this site they set up.  I chose the latter and ended up getting my Acer Aspire V5-122P-0889.  It was refurbished, but you wouldn't know it.  Granted, it's a slow computer, but for free?  Heck yeah!  I do wish I would have not been so impatient and had waited a day or two for a better model to be listed, but oh well.  Again, it was free, so what do I care?  LOL.   

It sure does pay to register your products.  :)  
Photo of Michael McDowell

Michael McDowell

  • 535 Posts
  • 208 Reply Likes
"A 366Mhz Celeron " ???

Maybe a 366Mhz Pentium?
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
Celeron processors were pretty amazing for the time. The originals were basically Pentium 2 processors minus the cache memory. They still performed pretty dang good. Eventually Intel was able to shrink the cache and put it directly on the chip. Celeron got the on die cache and it performed just as good as the Pentium 2 processors that had double the cach on the slot 1 board instead of on the die.
Photo of aabbcc

aabbcc

  • 5 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
366 Celeron, I picked out one of those for some family. At the time, pretty fast.

First, TI keyboard type with cartridge slot. Second, Packard Bell from Sears, 40MB hard drive, I think a 286, 12 MHz. Third, Gateway p120, I think 16mb ram. Fourth, Dell p4 1.8 with 512mb rdram. 5, 6, 7 self assembled.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
If I remember correctly, the early Celerons were very easy to overclock.

It wasn’t difficult to take a 300 MHz processor and overlock it to 450 MHz. All you had to do was go in the BIOS and change the bus speed from 66 MHz to 100 MHz. Of course, your SDRAM had to be PC100 for it to work.

It was a very nice trade off for the lack of cache on the early processors.

Those were the days back when technology was still fun. Now we take for granted the disposable super computers that fit in our pockets.
(Edited)
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1438 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
"A 366Mhz Celeron " ??? Maybe a 366Mhz Pentium?
Nope.  It was definitely a Celeron.  It worked very well for the time.  
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1438 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
Now we take for granted the disposable super computers that fit in our pockets.
Pretty much.  Heck, my Raspberry Pi outperforms that eMachines by leaps and bounds, and it costs $35, plus the micro sd card, which is nearly four times the capacity and so much faster.  :) 
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2544 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
Yep. The 366 MHz Celeron ran on a 66 MHz bus with a 5.5x multiplier. They definitely existed and could easily be overclocked to 550 MHz in a 100 MHz bus with some good PC100 SDRAM.

By that time, all Celerons had integrated cache as well.
(Edited)
Photo of Chuck Mayo

Chuck Mayo

  • 28 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Last week, a 40mb file took me 2 hours 22 minutes to download. That's faster than dialup, too!
Photo of Al Santayos

Al Santayos

  • 105 Posts
  • 31 Reply Likes
Dial up didn't drop out a dozen times a day for up to 2 hours at a time like my VIASAT did.
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2546 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
You never experienced a busy signal when trying to dial in? Busy signals were pretty common amongst most providers once AOL started charging a flat rate of $20 a month.
Photo of Bradley

Bradley

  • 1196 Posts
  • 388 Reply Likes
I had Netzero “free for life”, though sadly they don’t honor that agreement anymore.
Photo of Al Santayos

Al Santayos

  • 105 Posts
  • 31 Reply Likes
No busy signal on dial-up. I did not have AOL. My brief experience with dial up I had MSN which quickly dropped dial up service, but I was lucky back in the day to live in the city in Southern California where DSL through the phone company was available before most people got it. I think that DSL was something like 786K but it blew away the VIASAT I had here 95% of the time.
Photo of Al Santayos

Al Santayos

  • 105 Posts
  • 31 Reply Likes
AOL used to be so evil, my mom had it with automatic payments tied to a credit card. When she died I called them to cancel service, they told me only the subscriber or an authorized agent could cancel and I would have to mail them documents showing I was the executor of her estate. I just cancelled the credit card. I think AOL has lower morals than VIASAT if that can be believed.
Photo of Brad

Brad, Viasat Employee

  • 3265 Posts
  • 1220 Reply Likes
The anxiousness of seeing if the AOL guy makes it to his friends while connecting. Then like my aunt will call or something and drop the connection. 
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2546 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
Yep. I remember getting really upset when my connection to AOL dropped. You knew it would take at least another 30 minutes or so to get back online due to the busy signals.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4505 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
Way back in the day, the phone company would automatically drop a connection on calls that extended beyond 2 hours, because who would talk longer than that :).

Imagine losing your internet today after 2 hours. Lol
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2546 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
I had relatives that couldn’t even use dialup internet because they were on a party line.
Photo of Terry Hill

Terry Hill

  • 108 Posts
  • 36 Reply Likes
I was to busy playing Playstation to bother with internet at that time lol
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1441 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
I had relatives that couldn’t even use dialup internet because they were on a party line. 
I didn't even know party lines still existed when dialup started.  

I always thought it was funny when I would see one of those 900 number ads for being able to have a bunch of people talking at the same time, or just when someone wanted to listen in on other people talking to each other.  I thought, "Oh, so now they're charging $1.99 per minute for a party line?"  LOL.  
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4505 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
Party lines still in the 70's. Dont remember them still in 80's. Still was rotary in 80's and some touch phones could be switched to dial either way.

Where is my acoustic modem!!!
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 684 Posts
  • 95 Reply Likes
Telephone Party Lines Were Once High Entertainment...By 2000, according to USA Today, there were still over 5,000 party lines still in existence in the U.S., but the majority of them were hooked up to only one remaining household.

Major carriers wiped them out, but smaller telcos may still have them.  I'm aware of a person still with a party line.
Photo of Jab

Jab

  • 684 Posts
  • 95 Reply Likes
Tommy Tutone - 867-5309/Jenny
Photo of Stephen Rice

Stephen Rice, Champion

  • 2546 Posts
  • 1312 Reply Likes
I’m pretty sure my cousins in northern Louisiana didn’t get private phones until cell phones became common.
Photo of VeteranSatUser

VeteranSatUser, Champion

  • 4505 Posts
  • 2756 Reply Likes
Nor the internet.

That is why your speeds are so good. If nobody uses the beam, more bandwidth for you!!!
(Edited)
Photo of Ricky5

Ricky5

  • 6 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
Faster than dialup ain’t saying much.
Photo of fmj77

fmj77

  • 551 Posts
  • 335 Reply Likes
"Faster than dial up" is not an accurate comparison between Viasat and dial up. I downloaded a 35GB game a couple of week ago in a little over 5 hours over my satellite connection. If you tried doing that with dial up it would still be downloading after you're dead.
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1440 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
It would take roughly 87 days to download 35GB on a 40Kbps dialup connection.  Can you imagine?  Three months!!!  LOL.

And I thought performing one of the major Windows 10 updates would be awful.

On my old HughesNet legacy plan it would have taken 52 hours.  SMH.  Now it would take me less than two.    
Photo of fmj77

fmj77

  • 551 Posts
  • 335 Reply Likes
Gabe, and that is assuming that your dial up connection doesn't disconnect during that period. Mine could never go more than a couple of hours without losing the connection.
(Edited)
Photo of Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314

Steve Frederick-VS1/Beam314, Champion

  • 2943 Posts
  • 1868 Reply Likes
My dial up connection never was better than 18 Kbps, and as fmj77 mentioned, it typically would drop the connection after two hours. The ISP owner said that was programmed into his system so others could have a chance at getting on the internet. And all those times I would get that dreaded busy signal, no thanks. No more dial up for me.

Viasat works great for me, it is either Viasat or Hughesnet, no other options available at my house in the country.
Photo of GabeU

GabeU, Champion

  • 1440 Posts
  • 864 Reply Likes
18Kbps?  WOW.  I thought the 30-35Kbps I would get with AOL back in 2002-2004 was bad.  It wouldn't drop out a lot, but it would drop out.  

When I had satellite internet installed I was happy as a lark.  The difference was amazing.  Well, the second day, anyway, as on the first day my upload speed was about 200Kbps and my download speed about 50Kbps.  The lady I talked to said she had never seen that before and switched me to a different transponder.  Whether what she said was true or not, who knows, but what she did fixed the issue.  Then I was happy as a lark.  LOL.  
Photo of Voyager

Voyager

  • 136 Posts
  • 46 Reply Likes
Not too bad for Liberty plan during prime time.